Disclaimer:

Disclaimer: If you are easily offended by sheer honesty, or you think me having my own opinions is "being negative", then this is not the place for you, and I suggest you leave and head elsewhere. I call a spade a spade, and I don't sugarcoat anything.

Sunday, April 26, 2020

Why Hate All Dog Breeders?

This is the group I was telling you all about in my last post. Well, it's not really a group, it's a page on Facebook. But it's all rescue people who tout how much they hate dog breeders. It's called I Hate Dog Breeders.  It's nothing but a bunch of ADS fags fake-laughing, joking around and bad-mouthing all breeders. These are the kind of people I don't like myself. But then again, I feel the same way about ALL radicals. Just like any other kind of radicals, these people don't even realize they're radicals. They think that they're just monkeying around for the sake of animals in shelters. Sadly though, just like all radicals, they make others of their kind look bad.

The funny thing is, I was once in the same boat with these people. I hated all breeders too. If you look back toward the beginning of this blog, up until about a few years ago, you'll notice I said a lot of bad things about dog breeders too. And still, even today, I don't forgive the old show breeders for what they did to me on that email group I was in that made me turn against show breeders. A group that I don't even think is still up. Not sure if Yahoo got rid of all it's email groups, I haven't been on Yahoo in ages. But I was in a group of chihuahua breeders (all of them show breeders) and I did not like the attitude of the people I saw. Particularly the one named John Cipollina. He was so quick to snap at me for basically no reason whatsoever and throw his ton of weight at me as well. At first, I rationally tried to calm the situation by clarifying what I'd said, but he still continued to attack me angrily. Next thing I knew, all his dumbass friends were also ganging up on me. Then I felt the need to defend myself, to tell them to back off, basically.


But my hatred of show breeders went further back than that. It went all the way back to Bischi on the anti-merle chihuahua forum. I caught her in lies more than once. And this was an old woman!! She proved to me that show breeders were people who never grew up. For some reason though, she was stuck on me. She refused to admit it, but I think she really wanted to be friends with me. Unfortunately for her, the feeling was not mutual. How could I be friends with someone I cannot trust? And she proved to me, more than once, that she cannot be trusted. This was what I came to know in the beginning of what show breeders are like.

Well, thankfully I haven't heard from Bischi or John Cipollina in a long time. Not that I miss them. Both had a hand in ruining my views of show breeders. But then back in 2016, I met someone who would override all I thought before about show breeders. I won't say her name here, but she was a younger woman, probably around the same age as my sis, she bred and showed chihuahuas, she loved the 80s rock groups, and also sells jewelry. I've bought a few necklaces of her's and I love them. She does not make money off her dogs, she makes most of her income selling this jewelry. She restored my faith in show breeders once again. She is NOTHING like Bischi NOR John Cipollina!! She is a good person. And I am not being paid to say that either. LOL! I'm saying it because I've found it to be true.

There are times I still agree with rescuing a dog. Like if someone is looking for one of these "designer mutts". No need to go to a person who is breeding those and pay massive amounts of money for a mutt. Go to a shelter, and you'll find some that need homes. Or if you want a bully-type dog, there are plenty in rescues. We don't need anymore pit bulls being bred. There's too many already. There, I will agree more with going to a rescue than buying from a breeder. But there are some breeds some people want that you will not find in any shelter or rescue anywhere. Skye terriers are one. Vastgottaspets are increasing in popularity, so that is another. The problem is not responsible breeders. The problem is a lack of education, and people simply breeding to whatever they think is cute, rather than doing pedigree research to find a good match. Or like a single woman with 3 very young kids living in an apartment who buys a border collie because it looks attractive. Or the guy who buys a cocker spaniel from a backyard breeder because it's a popular breed and he didn't want to go through the vigorous background checks responsible breeders put their clients through, or pay the money a reputable breeder charges. Or the backyard breeder who breeds "laberdoos" because 'everyone wants one', without gaining the knowledge of what it takes to breed well-mannered dogs. Those are the people to blame for dogs in shelters. And all can be fixed with some education.

Anyways, let's begin with these posts I found on there. These people sound like I used to be...



Well, to both of those people, I say they should see the posts the owner of this page takes down. I commented on that page, and I think all I said was I bought my dog from a breeder, and I love her. I don't remember now. But I did not call anyone in there names. I did not spread hate. I didn't even call them what they are on their page; ADS fags. LOL! But I was banned, and probably called names, and my post was taken down. I'm not even a breeder. I'm currently just a pet owner. And my dog is spayed. She isn't contributing to the pet overpopulation.

I knew what I wanted when I got Mya, I wanted a shetland sheepdog puppy that was mahogany in color, and smaller than average shelties. How can I find exactly those specifications in a dog at the pound? Mya came along and I grabbed her. I wanted her more than anything. And to this day, I do not regret getting her. She's helped me in ways no human could. Most breeders would not like me posting about my specs, they usually do not like buyers who want a certain size, or color. I've come across those kind of breeders before, and yes, they were reputable. Even I admit that now. Even though at the time, I despised being turned down by show breeders.

Then I saw this post...


True, there is a difference between someone calling themselves a "reputable breeder" and someone who actually is a reputable breeder. ADS people will never understand it though. But a reputable breeder is not the same thing as a backyard breeder. A reputable breeder does pedigree research. They do not breed unless they have a purpose, either they have a waiting list, or they want to produce something to show. They don't just sell any puppies to anybody. I've seen people who wanted to get on the waiting list for a puppy from a reputable breeder, but got turned down because they didn't meet the breeder's requirements for one of their puppies. So, there's your "greedy show breeders" for you.

Like I said earlier in this post, I have also been on the receiving end of childish name-calling from other show breeders. But then again, I've also seen the same thing from rescue people. The difference I've seen is, today's show breeders only resort to bashing pages like "I Hate Dog Breeders" because they clump all breeders (including truly reputable breeders) in the same category with puppymillers and backyard breeders without even considering the difference. And rescue ADS people just flat-out attacks everybody, whether they are breeders or not, reputable or not, agrees with them or not. They treat all pet lovers the same way. In short, reputable breeders are like conservatives, while rescue people are like leftists. I also know a lot of show breeders who foster, and yes, even adopt from shelters. Reputable breeders are not all bad. But rescue people are all bad. So, that's the difference between the two groups. But people like the owner of this page will never understand that. They see the world in black and white. "You either get your dog from a rescue, or you are a rotten, horrible, nasty asshole that hates animals and has no respect for life".

Those people will fall in love with ANYONE who tells them what they want to hear. Even if said person is not a good person. Today I looked in their page and found this...


Fucking Adam Ruins Everything???!!! OMG!!! They love this guy too! I don't. Adam Ruins Everything is the same person who has said Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton and Obama are all better than President Trump, and Antifa has never harmed anyone, and that socialism and communism would be best for our country. My ass I'm gonna listen to Adam Ruins Everything!!! Fuck him! He even looks too much like a typical leftists for me to put any trust in! But these people love him because he says the things they agree with and doesn't contradict their opinions.

So I ask all of you, who are the more reasonable crowd here?

Friday, April 24, 2020

Why It Shouldn't Hurt You

Fuck these jerks!! Fuck this woman!! People like this are exactly the reason why I hate rescue people who squeal "Adopt Don't Shop!" I totally blame the HSUS for people like this! Them AND PETA! This blog is by a couple who travel across the country with 2 dogs that they do little more on their blog than boast about how they "rescued these dogs from the shelter". As if that is some great accomplishment! How hard did you really have to work to get those 2 dogs from a shelter? Did you have to tread through raging water? Snow? Or ice? Did you have to sacrifice anything to get the money to save to bring those two dogs home? No! Most likely you did neither one of those things! You filled out an application. ANYONE can do that. You paid a few dollars that was probably doing nothing in your pocket but collecting lint anyway, and bang! You brought 2 dogs home from a shelter. The dogs were probably imported there anyways from some place like Korea.

In short, YOU did not rescue the dogs. The person who took them from the meat market did.

If you want to follow along, the blog I am referring to is here. While I love to see anybody get a nice dog no matter where they got it from, this article first appeared on a Facebook page that laughs at breeders dying. This same page on Facebook is the embodiment of the attitude typical of ADS fags. It's a page that calls it's self "I Hate Dog Breeders". They ban breeders from their page, insult anyone who buys from breeders, and erase any comments that contradicts what they believe in. The very kind of people I always refer to as ADS fags. Anyways, I'll get to them later. Right now, I want to concentrate on this stupid blog put up by some completely irrational and judgmental people. LOL!

I usually say it's cat people who are mean and hateful. Well, when you become an ADS fag, it doesn't matter. ALL rescue people are hateful. This couple wants to make "rescues the breed of choice". Well, I hate to tell them this, but it won't work for me. I've had a 'rescue'. She was saved from a puppymill. While I did love her to death, she had absolutely no manners when I brought her home. She was pissing and shitting all over the floor. I had to try and break her out of that habit, but I was never completely able to. She would still continue to use my carpet as her personal restroom. As soon as she died, I said I was never going to get another rescue dog again as long as I live. And especially after seeing the attitude of the ADS fags, it's going to be very easy to keep that promise. Like I said before, they lump ALL breeders into the same category.

Anyway, here goes...

Maybe it’s just me.  I am scrolling thru my social media feeds and then, I see the post. 

Yes. It is just you. You have a severe mental issue. But I will say this, you're not alone. There's plenty more ADS fags out there with the same mentality as you. And it should be stopped.

A friend who just got a new dog or a new cat.  At first, I get excited thinking about visiting the new addition, and wonder what they will name him or her. 

If it were me, I'd just be happy for my friend who got this sweet puppy that they saw and loved, and decided to give a good home to.

Then, I wonder what shelter or rescue that they adopted from. I mean,  I don’t even think that they may have bought him.

And why not? I know you commies hate it, but this is still a free country. A person can do whatever they want to with their own money. No one needs your permission to do it.

It is always in the back of my mind, the hope that they indeed went to a rescue or a shelter to pick out their new family member.

Unless it is one of your own family members that you want to control, you have no right to get in the way of others.

I want to ask directly if they adopted, but feel it is rude to do so. 

At least this proves you have some sense of what is wrong or right. But like all leftists, you let your own personal feelings rule over your mind.

Then, I get my answer and I am hit right in the stomach.  They bought him? They bought him? 

They BOUGHT him???? Oh NO!!! Stop the presses! GOD stop the world from spinning! My widdle feewings have been hoited!!! And someone has to pay!

Maybe it was a pet store, maybe a breeder. 

Well, I would indeed hope it was a good, reputable breeder who does health-tests and knows the pedigrees of their dogs and the background, and knew what they wanted to produce BEFORE they bred the parents!

And I am devastated.  It hurts.  And I am going to admit it.  It hurts bad. 

Again, that is a YOU problem! And I might suggest in such a case, get off the vegan diet, get some top-notch therapy, and get over yourself!

I want to ignore it, I want to be happy for them and the dog.

Then shut the fuck up and be happy! Think of how I feel when I see INXS fans who get cats instead of dogs. I have to keep my mouth shut too.

After all, it isn’t the dog’s fault, is it?  And I tell myself that.  But somehow, I feel disrespected.  It is like everything that I stand for is invalidated.

That's because ADS-faggotry is invalid. You do not have the right to tell people what they can and cannot do with their own lives and their own money.

I’ve spent the three years traveling the United States and I visited 48 shelters and rescues.  I saw firsthand the plight of homeless animals, and the blatant disregard from humans for them.

Too bad you do not have the mental capacity to learn that this is not the fault of reputable breeders. There is a BIG difference. Animals are in shelters because of irresponsible owners, backyard breeders and puppymills.

But I also saw the good people making a difference for these animals. 

So, where are these "good people"? I've never met one. All I see of these so-called "good people" are people who resort to childish name calling, laughing about innocent breeders dying, and just generally making others like you look bad.

So, when I see your post on social media that you bought an animal, or that you bred an animal, it will hurt me. 

Again, I suggest some hardcore therapy to undo whatever it was in your past that made you this way. Maybe it was kids in school bullying you? Or an unloving parent? Or complete lack of a father figure? I don't know. That's for you to find out and solve.

Will I still consider myself your friend?  I will, but it will be different between us. 

Then said person would probably be better off NOT having you as a friend. That's what I say whenever I have a "friend" like you.

And that is the honest truth.  The more we ignore the problems facing animals in our country, the more those problems become bigger problems.

Bullying, and pushing your views on others is not the way to go. First, we need to get rid of the root problem. Telling people "adopt, don't shop" is NOT going to do anything! Not everyone is so easy to mislead. Education is the key. Educating new owners or wannabe owners to do research on breeds will help. I always wanted a husky dog. Ever since I was a kid. But guess what, I don't have one, and likely will never get one. If I had not educated myself about the breed early on, I'd no doubt be one of those surrendering an uncontrollable dog to my nearest shelter now. So, learn to educate people about the breeds they want to get instead of saying "There's lots of huskies in shelters. Go there and get one." Maybe that person would not be compatible with that breed at all. Even if they rescue it, they might get it in their minds to put it back in the shelter once they find out they were not compatible with that breed.

 I cannot understand, and never will, how people can put their own desires ahead of what is right. 

Because what is "right" to you, and what is right to others may be two totally different things. You will never understand why anyone else thinks differently than you do. And trying to do so only will give you gray hair and wrinkles. So, stop trying.

I have heard it all. “I like a specific breed.”  Well.  Go to a breed specific rescue.
Again, that is the wrong approach. Educate!!

“Rescue animals are damaged”.  Oh, I’m sorry.  I didn’t know you were perfect.
Again, maybe those damaged animals are not compatible with that person's lifestyle. Maybe they have kids and don't want to risk their well-being with a dog that could snap in a second.

“The rescue wants to make a home visit.  I don’t have time for that.”  Then you probably don’t have enough time for a pet.
I can honestly say working in a rescue myself for 3 years, I have NEVER heard this excuse. But I have heard of people turning in applications only to get rejected for piddly little reasons, like so-n-so lives in an apartment (for an indoor cat). Or so-n-so doesn't have a balcony (for a ranch-style home).

Does rescuing an animal take more time than buying from a breeder?  It does.
And why do so, when you can use that time and money to get exactly the dog you want, and raise it to your own specifications and not have to worry about carrying someone else's baggage to your house?

Oftentimes, you may have to wait to see an animal, or pay an adoption fee.  
Then it isn't really "rescuing". Is it? That's purchasing. I can go to a good breeder and get the same effect PLUS, get EXACTLY what I want in a dog.

You may not find your pet soulmate immediately. 
Again, it's the same thing going to a good breeder.

You may adopt an animal with a little baggage and have to be more patient, or they may require more training. 
And if you have kids, why risk it? Before you notice there is a problem, that dog could lash out at the kid, disfiguring or even killing, them.

 I also realize that I alone can’t change everything. But I sure changed everything for my two rescue dogs, Brickle and Digby.
And I, as a good person, am happy you got them and you indeed love them. Every dog deserves love. No matter how they are acquired. But you ADS fags you're more worried about how that person got the dog, rather than be happy the person found a dog to love.

I also realize that everyone has a right to their opinions and feelings.  But my feelings are hurt.  And I admit it.
Well, no one else needs to care about your feelings. Look what happens to cities that are governed by feelings. They turn to shit. If everyone ran their lives based on how you (or other ADS fags) feel, then no one would be allowed to have a dog. And then I'd have no other choice but to get a cat and that would completely SUCK!!!!

Thursday, April 23, 2020

Hunter Avallone Is Now An SJW?

Well, he says no. He agrees with some of the things the left says now, as well as the right. So he calls himself a centrist, which my sis says is basically what a libertarian is. But Hunter Avallone has always believed in free speech, and gun rights. He used to be right-leaning, and making fun of such channels as Queer Kids Stuff. He seemed to be against QKS indoctrinating children into becoming queer and other such nonsense. But guess what. Now, he is totally in line with being queer. In fact, he calls people who do not think kids should be indoctrinated "neo-nazis". Just like an SJW would. And why this sudden change in Hunter Avallone's perception? Because of an atheist gay dude who calls himself Vaush. Avallone did a debate with Vaush and apparently, he got owned. So he admits. He also admits that his views on LGBTQ issues has changed. So now, he calls people who disagree with that "neo-nazis" and "bigots" and "dumb" and "stupid".

I will be the first to agree that everyone deserves BASIC human rights. Even transgender people. But now, trannies want MORE rights than normal people. I believe that's wrong. You can't FORCE me to see you the way you see yourself. If you are a man and you see yourself as a woman, then that is on you. You cannot force me, nor do I feel you have any right to force me, to see you as a woman. Especially when you don't act like a woman. This was called to my attention when Vince, of the Red Elephants, said Hunter Avallone called him a neo-nazi and called him stupid for not agreeing with him about trans rights. I was shocked! I had to see for myself. So, I went to his video. When I saw what he was saying, this was my response...


Not only watch his IQ go down when he starts collecting those cats, but now his children will be born autistic and ugly. I haven't watched the debate with Hunter Avallone and Vaush, it's 3 hours long, but I have a feeling Hunter Avallone failed because he just didn't do enough research. I'm not as easy to convince though. Vaush can debate me if he wants to, but I am not so easy to destroy. I don't believe someone can become a man if they are born a girl. And vice-versa. There is nothing anyone can say that will convince me they can. Because all the so-called "science" behind modern day transgenderism has been debunked so many times. It's not even real science! It's just a group of pseudo-scientists giving into the feelings of the leftists. The real scientists who say no, you cannot be born male and legitimately transition to female have been silenced by the leftists, and called "bigots" and "nazis". Search engines like Google have even removed their written reports about that from the internet so no one can search them. But I can even debate Vaush using my own feelings if that's the way he wants to go. But I would guarantee Vaush will be calling me a bigot or neo-nazi LONG before he's able to convince me transgenderism is legit. Maybe even a whole bunch of other names, just like ALL leftists always resort to when they know they can't win an argument on merit alone. LOL!

How about I offer Vaush a plate of rat poison, covered in chocolate, and tell him that's perfectly safe to eat because I said so? Would he agree it would be safe to eat just because I said it is and dressed it up in chocolate? I would hope not! That's what transgenderism is like to me. It's the same effect. The same goes for all this pronoun bullshit! How about if I FORCE Vaush to eat that plate of chocolate-covered rat poison because I say it's perfectly safe? And if he refuses, I call him names like "fatphobic" or "misogynist"? That is what this pronoun identity politics bullshit is like to me! If you talk like a girl, and you act like a girl, don't expect me to call you a "he" or a "they". Because I won't! I'll call you a she!

One may argue "It's not the same. You cannot die from calling a man who identifies as a woman a she." Well, you're WRONG!!! A lot of women have been hurt by men who see themselves as women. Look at what is happening in women's sports. How about that woman who was boxing with a man who identified as a woman, and got her face literally smashed in? You going to try and convince me she was not hurt by this? Like I said, I believe trans people should have basic human rights. The right to live, the right to love, the right to be happy. But when their rights begin to infringe upon my rights, then we've got a problem! I was very much in favor of gay people getting the right to marry. I'm fine with that. But now, they are demanding MORE rights! Now, they want to force everyone to represent queer people in every movie, TV show and children's book. That is going too far! That is infringing on MY rights!!! I don't want to put queers in my movies if I don't believe they will bring anything good to the movie. Same with TV shows. Same with my stories! And you can't make me do it! I'll refuse and fight you to the end with everything I've got!

Monday, April 13, 2020

The Bad Pet People

The other day there was a post on this group I am on in Facebook, and it's all about what kind of snobs are the worst. Well, you all know how I feel about cat people, so I won't discuss that here. But I will tell you there were several people who actually agreed with me when I said cat people are mean and hateful. In the case of one person, she even stated the reason she hates cats so much is because of cat people.

Now, don't get me completely wrong here. There are some dog people I find unpleasant too. Most of them were the baby-boomer show breeders. I remember all the shit I put up with when I was breeding chihuahuas. I'd rather have cancer than deal with people like them again! And don't even get me started on pit bull people!!!! They don't even have to be show breeders to be obnoxious! And the rescue community. You know them! They're the self-entitled "Adopt don't shop" crowd. I hate them possibly more than ANYONE else!!! I see one of them and I just want to bash them a good one upside their head!!! They make me so mad! The worst thing about them is they lump ALL breeders into the same category. They don't know that there is such a thing as good breeders and bad breeders. They just believe all breeders are bad. And they seem to want to keep their beliefs that way. They don't want to learn the difference between a good breeder and a bad breeder. Even though there is a significant difference.

Anyway, there is another breed of pet people that I also don't like. I find I am not the only one either! That's horse people. Over the years of myself being around horses, I find the people who prefer horses are some of the most beautiful people I've ever seen. But they are also the unfriendliest people I've ever seen. Horse people are the kind of people that have their noses so high in the air, they'd drown in a summer shower!! I never met a more stuck-up bunch in my life!! But you know why horse people are so snooty? It's because those people have jobs that earn them upwards of $100,000 or more per year. So, they are ritzy-type, snooty rich people. I've known horse people were snooty for years too! When we lived in Lakewood, there was a couple of guys I used to see riding horses around the lake I used to go walking at. I remember one time I asked one of them if I could pet their horses. I was just a teenager then. These guys looked to be in their 20s or early 30s. The guy blatantly said no. The next time I saw him, he was shouting childish names at me. It kinda bothered me, because back then I never expected older people to be calling me names. This was before I met Tracy at the Puyallup Fair. Before I met her, I thought the majority of 30-year olds were mature. With a very few exceptions. These horse guys were the exceptions. Nowadays, I don't expect anyone to be mature, even if they are in their 60s. I expect trouble from anyone as long as they are humans. Which is why I don't like people.

Anyway, back then hearing 2 grown men calling me names was strange to me. But it was my first look into what horse people are like. These days, I still encounter horse people. And they don't call me names (not that I hear anyways) but they are still equally as snooty. But of all the people who commented on that thread in that group, most of them said they don't like horse people, and I can definitely see why. Not all horse people are like that, obviously. I'm not saying that. But in general, when I see horse people, I usually expect them to be snooty and stuck-up.

This is all kinda funny. All my younger days, I thought all animal lovers were good people. You hear so many people say if someone abuses an animal, they are more likely to turn on people. But what about the people who do love animals and turn on people? I don't doubt they love animals. But they kinda betray the knowledge that people who abuse animals will also abuse other people sooner or later. I see more people who claim to love animals abusing people than the other way around. Especially now in the age of the internet. It just doesn't make sense. I think abuse of other people has more to do with lousy parenting more than whether a person abuses an animal or not. That is, parents who don't discipline their children, or parents who simply just abuse their kids. Those are the kinds I always find grow to abuse other people. Abusing animals is more of a symptom of an even deeper problem. I've seen it happen.

Saturday, April 11, 2020

The Onision Files

I've been waiting for months to write something like this on this blog about Onision's court day because I wanted to see where this character was going to go with it next. But let me start from the beginning here...

Back in December, while Onision was on Twitter, bad-mouthing Chris Hansen, he left his 3 year old daughter unattended, and she fell 2 stories out of a window. When I think about that now, I get pissed off, because of Onision's negligence. So, what does Onision do about it? Does he call 911 right away? Does he run downstairs and out the door to caress his child to see if she is OK? No! He doesn't. The first thing he does is grab his video camera and start filming his daughter as she falls out the window and onto a paved driveway below. And why? Because he didn't want to be blamed for his child falling out the window. He didn't want his viewers to believe he pushed her out the window. If that isn't the most selfish, obtuse, indignant thing I've ever heard (not to mention irresponsible) then I don't know what is! If my child was about to fall out the window, the very last thing that would be on my mind is to grab my video camera so I don't get blamed for that! Onision is to blame for it anyway because he allowed a 3 year old to wander close to an open window and he did nothing to prevent the child from falling out!

Let me rephrase that; it wouldn't be the LAST thing on my mind! It just wouldn't even enter my mind to grab my video camera and film my child falling out of the window! I'd be more concerned with preventing my child from falling out of a window. I'd be on my feet as fast as possible to pull her away from the window! That is what a responsible parent does. But Onision is not a responsible parent. He's not even a responsible person. If he were a responsible person, he wouldn't have been masturbating with himself at the thought of sugar-daddying Chris Hansen on Twitter. All Onision thinks of is sex. Even if it's having sex with himself, which according to people who have lived with him, he does quite frequently. I think I once heard one of his former girlfriends say Onision has anime-type imaginary friends who he pretends to have sex with too.

Every time I think of Onision letting his child fall out of a window, I get pissed!!! He shouldn't have let that happen!!! I don't care if he was masturbating with himself at the time! It's not worth risking the life of a child!

Well, several days later, Chris Hansen shows up at Onision's house for an interview. Onision did not invite Chris Hansen, so he says. Personally, I think he did invite him, by all those perverted things Onision has been writing on Twitter about Chris Hansen. That was practically an invite. But Onision, who acted so big and brave on Twitter, to talk about sexual favors he wanted from Chris Hansen, would not even answer the door. Instead he hid behind his stairwell and called 911 to report Chris Hansen "trespassing" on his property. The 911 operator's response when Onision said it was Chris Hansen at his door was priceless! It almost sounded like she was holding back saying "So? What did you do to bring him there?" Everyone knows Chris Hansen is a whistleblower on child predators like Onision!

Here is a video of that call with Chris Hansen's commentary...


So anyway, a month later Onision decides he's going to go to court and sue Chris Hansen for slander and trespassing charges. And the funny thing is, he also decided to sue Repzion too! Repzion didn't even do anything to Onision! Once in a while he makes videos bashing Onision, but then so do a lot of people on YouTube. Onision is one of the most hated people on YouTube. I'm hated on Facebook among INXS fans, and have been slandered before by them. But I don't take them to court because I am such a believer in free speech. They can say whatever they like about me, I don't care! But if they're going to throw accusations at me, they'd better provide proof of it. I'm the first to admit when I am wrong though.

Anyway, several people who have lived with Onision have come forward and said what a horrible person he is. So, there's your proof he is no good! That's the only proof you'll ever get, because Onision never admits when he is wrong. Instead he blames the victims. Notice in that video how he said his victims who he didn't want to be around anymore, had mental problems that negatively impacted his life. Then he whines saying "They've been online saying mean things about me". But you can't be a child-predator and not expect people to say hateful things about you. That's a given! You deserve nothing but hatred if you're going to abuse children!

Anyway, someone went to court on Onision's court date, and actually saw him. Here's a famous pic she took of him standing in an elevator...


He's trying to look so calm and collected. But this was one of the stupidest moves he ever made. Repzion talked about his court date with Onision and said it was more of a farce. A lot of people in the courtroom tried so hard to contain their laughter when Onision walked in, that you could actually hear it! Repzion described Onision's enterance into the court room as him trying to look full of confidence, but at the same time, nervous about being there. This is how he stood before the judge...


He has on a tux and tie, and sneakers. And that strange hump on his back. Repzion said that was probably a bullet-proof vest. But he has it on wrong. Either that, or Onision is planning an extended deep-sea diving trip after court. Anyway he looks wacky! A person knows they are hated by everyone when they have to wear a bullet-proof vest everywhere they go. Onision did not hire a lawyer, instead he wanted to represent himself in court. But Repzion did hire a lawyer. Later on, Onision mocked Repzion for hiring a lawyer. It seems Onision thinks he knows more than the professionals. That's why he never hires professionals. But he also mocks people who do hire professionals, which is dumb. He called Repzion "stupid" and said he "can't speak for himself". I remember a few times having this same kind of conversation with people about breeding chihuahuas. I remember on the Pluba forum, Rhonda, who always made fun of me, told me that I listened to Tanya (of Tanya's Toys Chihuahuas) because I am a "spineless person". It's no different than Onision saying Repzion "can't speak for himself" because he hired a lawyer. Just like Rhonda, Onision also has a big ego. Which is why he said something to that effect about Repzion.

Neither one of them were thinking that maybe we worked with professionals because we want to do things the right way. If you're getting sued, yes you want to hire a lawyer! Someone who is more familiar with the laws and can win your case in court. And I wanted to breed winning chihuahuas in dog shows, so yes, I'm going to listen to someone who actually has dogs who win in shows! People who actually have brains in their heads will always listen to those who know better. I've never heard of a case where someone listened to an amateur and got anywhere ahead. I'm not going to listen to a homeless person what lottery numbers to play. I'm not going to pay attention to a redneck with one tooth in his mouth tell me how to clean my teeth! No! I'm going to listen to the people who have had the results I want to have. If that makes me "spineless" or makes Repzion "not able to speak for himself" then so be it! No one with any sense cares what you think anyway!

Anyway, for someone who wanted to represent himself in court, Onision didn't do a very good job! He dismissed the case himself and said he was going to look for other legal avenues. That means, he is going to go back on Twitter and look for someone who can give him some cheap (or no-cost) ways to win his case. Which basically is that Onision is just going to make videos whining and griping about how Repzion and Chris Hansen are stalking him because he wants to have sex with them.

Well, recently Onision challenged Chris Hansen to do an interview. But Onision wanted the interview to be on his own channel. Everyone knows why he wants this. He wants to control the conversation. You might want to watch this video of an interview Onision conducted with a reporter from Newsweek...


Especially pay attention toward the end where the reporter asks Onision if some more of his victims would want to do an interview about their experiences and Onision starts cussing the reporter out because he thinks the reporter is "trying to make money off the victims". HA!! This from a guy who made money for many months off calling Eugenia Cooney all kinds of names and making fun of her eating disorder. This is the kind of thing Onision does! The scary thing is, this could have been Chris Hansen. But Chris Hansen refused to do the interview on Onision's channel. Probably because he knew Onision would pull this stunt like he does with everyone! This is Onision's tactic; he gets them to appear on his channel, he hogs the conversation, gets people all confused, then he yells and calls the person he's interviewing childish names and ends the interview. Then he makes another video bragging to his viewers about how he's "won the battle". But Onision doesn't win! You automatically lose your argument when you start resorting to childish name-calling. And that's what Onision does ALL the time! Chris Hansen was wise not to take Onision's bait. Sorry for the Newsweek reporter who was put through that, but hopefully he learned not to fall for Onision's traps! Because he will take advantage of it, because he is a horrible individual!